Build bridges with it!

Today's class didn't go as well as I would have liked. I went around the circle and asked each student to contribute one scene, theme or question from the opening section of Jane Eyre to discuss, only to have several (maybe 5 or 6 out of 18?) admit that they "hadn't gotten very far yet" in the novel, so didn't feel qualified to contribute even one question or passage. This lack of contributions surprises me in part because there is so much to say about the first few chapters--even the first ten pages--of Jane Eyre. Then again, one student claimed he hadn't even bought the book yet, so maybe "I haven't gotten very far" means "I haven't yet read any of it."
Even more inconceivably, no one seems to like Jane Eyre very much. I would expect the novel to have some detractors, but to have 15 or 16 students give it two thumbs down? Several of whom have never read it, even when it was assigned? Most of whom are English majors? I have concluded that they are, perhaps, robots. Am I wrong to expect more enthusiasm from them?
The final baffling thing about today's class was the way in which they began closely reading the "red room" passage. It's partially my fault; I sort of invited strange answers by asking them to examine the ways in which colors are described in one of the paragraphs ("crimson," "blush," "snowy") and asking what these particular word choices might connote. Some of my students rightly tried to use other elements of the novel to interpret these descriptions, and all the speculation was going fine until several of the students concluded that all of the colors in the scene could be interpreted Biblically. There is plenty of justification for thinking about Jane Eyre alongside New Testament passages, and I agree that "crimson" could connote a blood sacrifice, and that Jane may even be sacrificed, in a sense, in this scene, but I draw the line at the student who claimed that if "crimson" meant blood, then the "mahogany" furniture meant that we were supposed to pay attention "to wood," which meant that the furniture was a stand in for a cross. But how do you teach that, while there are many "right" ways to read something, there are also some definitively "wrong" or illogical ways to read it?
I mean, what else do you do with wood?





